Taub Center

Donate

  • About Us
    • Mission, Vision and History
    • Researchers and Staff
    • Board of Directors and General Assembly
    • Policy Program Fellows
    • International Advisory Council
    • Organizational Policies
    • Job Opportunities
  • Research and Publications
    • What research areas interest you?
      • All Research
      • Economics
      • Health
      • Welfare
      • Education
      • Labor Markets
    • What type of content are you looking for?
      • Videos
      • Podcasts
      • Press Releases
    • What topics are trending?
      • #Israel at War
      • #Early Childhood
      • #Environment and Health
      • #Demography
  • Activities and Impact
    • Events
    • Impact
    • Annual Report 2023
  • In the Media
    • Press Releases
    • Articles
    • Videos
  • Our Blog
  • Contact Us
    • General Contact Information
    • Request a Lecture
  • Main Publications
    • State of the Nation Report
    • A Picture of the Nation
Newsletter
  • English
  • עברית

Subscribe to our newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter and stay up to date

הודעת דוא"ל זו אינה חוקית
Terms of Use Privacy Policy

Home Page » Researches » The Outsourcing of Welfare Services: Trends and Changes

The Outsourcing of Welfare Services: Trends and Changes

December 2016
Download Full Study

Author

שביט מדהלה

Shavit Ben-Porat

Researcher

Bio >
ג’וני גל

John Gal

Principal Researcher and Welfare Policy Program Chair

Bio >

 

The privatization of social welfare services is a process that has been on-going since the 1980s. This chapter sheds light on the phenomenon and concentrates on the privatization process as it relates to an array of services of the Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs. At the center of the analysis stand two questions: (1) What are the activity patterns of for-profit and nonprofit agencies working in this field? (2) Can we identify trends in market concentration in welfare service provision?

The study’s findings indicate that the extent of services that are outsourced by the Ministry has grown over the years: from 70% of the Ministry’s total expenditure in 2000 to about 80% in 2015. The majority of service providers to this ministry are veterans in the field, and they garner about 96% of the total payments for outsourced services. The findings relating to concentration levels indicate that competition among service providers in the field of personal social services is limited. The majority of the 50 largest providers, whose share among all of the outsourced service providers is about 2%, have provided services for many years and they garner about 46% of the total expenditures for outsourced services.

It is evident that there is no particular preference for nonprofit agencies in this process, and that in the eyes of policy makers there is no essential difference between for-profit and nonprofit agencies. The analysis of providers showed that most of them are for-profit providers. Nonetheless, the distribution of payments between the two kinds of providers indicates that about half of the payments went to nonprofits. In the years that were examined, there was a rise in the number of nonprofits working with the Ministry, and a simultaneous drop in the number of for-profit providers.

While competition among service providers is limited, the concentration indexes tested for the various departments indicate that competition does exist and is actually increasing with time. The research and results of the analysis raise the question of the importance of competition in the social service markets. On the one hand, the existence of competition between service providers is one of the justifications for privatization. On the other hand, in the series of interviews conducted for the study, it emerged that providers are selected mainly on the basis of their experience and expertise in providing the services. Thus, in a domain of services where there is a satisfactory provider, competition is of little importance. Moreover, it is argued that, in the social services, it is important to maintain continuity of care by a single service provider instead of encouraging turnover. This is meant to prevent upheavals due to staff changes, for instance, that could harm service recipients, especially when it comes to institutional settings.

This paper appears as a chapter in the Center’s annual publication, State of the Nation Report 2016, edited by Prof. Avi Weiss. 

More research on this topic

Welfare System Performance During the War and Policy Proposals

Welfare System Performance During the War and Policy Proposals

The full research is available in Hebrew only. With...

John Gal Shavit Ben-Porat Yael Ovadia
Who Provides Welfare and Education Services? Local Spending on Welfare and Education in Israel

Who Provides Welfare and Education Services? Local Spending on Welfare and Education in Israel

Local elections are just around the corner, prompting the...

John Gal Adi Tarabeih
The Welfare System During a Period of Dramatic Political Change

The Welfare System During a Period of Dramatic Political Change

Since the end of the COVID-19 crisis, political changes...

John Gal Shavit Ben-Porat Adi Tarabeih
The October War and Its Impact on Israel’s Society and Economy

The October War and Its Impact on Israel’s Society and Economy

In this chapter, Taub Center researchers review the impact...

Taub Center researchers

About  

  • Mission, Vision and History
  • Researchers & Staff
  • Board of Directors and General Assembly
  • Fellows
  • Organizational Policies
  • Job Opportunities

Research

  • State of the Nation Report
  • A Picture of the Nation
  • All Research
  • Economics
  • Education
  • Health
  • Welfare
  • Labor Markets

Additional content

  • Blog
  • Our Videos
  • Podcasts
  • Infographics
  • Annual Report 2023

Activity and impact

  • Events
  • Impact
  • Press Releases

Contact

  • Contact Us
  • Request a Lecture

Subscribe to our newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter and stay up to date
הודעת דוא"ל זו אינה חוקית
Terms of Use Privacy Policy

anova :web development